AI & ML
SAGE-PAIR: Source-Pretrained Routed Residual Adaptation for Sparse-Feedback Recommendation
arXiv cs.IR0 views
arXiv:2611.09728v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recommendation systems often enter a new serving window before enough outcomes are available to retrain the deployed model. We study this regime with 0.05-1.0% target feedback, a range that spans our stress tests while keeping supervision far below the degrees of freedom of the source recommender. At this scale, existing fine-tuning and meta-learning methods still estimate target-specific updates from extremely sparse feedback, leaving the update direction weakly identified. SAGE-PAIR instead transfers a source-supported residual correction space and only calibrates this space using target outcomes. We introduce SAGE-PAIR, a staged adapter that pretrains a low-dimensional global residual on an adjacent source period and adds a soft router over residual experts conditioned on source user profiles. Target feedback then calibrates this residual state rather than relearning the recommender. On a locked test split of KuaiSAR-v2, SAGE-PAIR (Full) achieves a 1.77% relative improvement in NDCG@10, while a core-protocol comparison shows a further 0.25% gain from routed experts beyond source-pretrained PAIR. Matched source-pretrained LoRA and Adapter-Tuning baselines remain near the source model, supporting the need for a different adaptation space. Thus, SAGE-PAIR improves ranking quality with millisecond-scale adaptation and inference costs. Sparse-feedback adaptation is fundamentally governed by the identifiability of the update space rather than by label count alone. Source pretraining supplies estimable correction directions for scarce labels, while user-conditioned routing contributes a consistent, differentiated cross-user correction on top of the global correction. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SAGE-PAIR-610E/.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09728PreviousSPARSEUP: Towards Better Recipes for Training Modern Learned Sparse RetrieversNextA Taxonomy-Driven Synthetic Dataset for Retrieval Effectiveness and Fairness Evaluation in Hiring
Related posts
![AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.11: Self Supervised Robot Learning [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fh8y4egw0kdqtzf6m3hzx.png)
AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.11: Self Supervised Robot Learning [EN]
0dev.to
![AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.13: Human Robot Interaction [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fjm36fpwnygomah6qsu4n.png)
AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.13: Human Robot Interaction [EN]
0dev.to
![AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.14: VLM and VLA [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fo06nxmfdm3t6o1oznau9.png)
AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.14: VLM and VLA [EN]
0dev.to
370 Books in 20 months: South African author defends her use of AI
0Hacker News
The climate case for AI has not been made
0MIT Technology Review
I Let Pangram Loose on My Gmail Inbox. Here’s How Much AI It Found
0Wired