AI & ML
The Invocation Bottleneck in LLM-Based Lossless Compression: What Can Be Removed and What Must Be Traded
arXiv math.IT0 views
arXiv:2611.05871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) compress text far better than classical compressors, but LLM-based compressors are slow, particularly during decompression. We argue that their decoding time has two fundamentally different sources. Execution redundancy, such as per-token host transfers, CPU-side coding, and token-by-token encoding, is work that the coded output does not require and can be removed without changing a single output bit. Sequential dependency, one model call per decoded token, is inherent to lossless decoding and cannot be removed by better execution, only traded for more calls or for more bits. We remove execution redundancy with a GPU-resident pipeline whose block-parallel encoding is made lossless in half precision by batch-invariant kernels, speeding up arithmetic coding by up to 5.8x in encoding and 3.0x in decoding without changing its compression rate. We then study the two ways of trading sequential dependency, speculative dual-model coding (SDMC) and multi-token single-model coding (MSMC), characterize the compression cost of predicting several tokens from a shared prefix, and identify the workloads in which fewer model calls are worth that cost.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05871PreviousFunctional inequalities from the fundamental limits of Bayesian estimationNextRay-Tracing-Based Dynamic Channel Sounding With Autoregressive Wi-Fi CSI Prediction
Related posts
Meta Quest Promo Codes and Coupons for November 2026
0Wired
BullMQ in NestJS: Retries, Idempotency and Dead-Letter Queues
0dev.to
80.6% at Chores, 12% at Real Work: AI's Benchmark Week
0dev.to
Efficient estimation of regression models for recurrent events in presence of terminal events
0arXiv stat.CO
Local Whittle estimation for distributional time series: A regularization framework in Bayes Hilbert space
0arXiv stat.CO
Inventory and Assortment Optimization under General Choice: A Unified Approximation Framework
0arXiv stat.CO