AI & ML
Which Acoustic Features Survive Compression? Tracker-Estimated First-Formant Statistics for Codec-Robust Audio DeepfakeDetection
arXiv cs.SD0 views
arXiv:2611.13258v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Audio deepfake detectors that work well on clean lab recordings often degrade after telephone or platform compression. This paper asks a specific question: which low-dimensional acoustic descriptors stay informative after codec degradation? We screen 36 utterance-level features(formants, PNCCs, LFCCs, prosody) on ASVspoof 2019 data and test on the official ASVspoof 2021 LA set across seven codec conditions. Of 33 statistically significant descriptors, only four show large practical separation (|r| >0.5, bootstrap 95% CIs), all first-formant (F1) measures, highly redundant (PC1: 79% variance). The payoff is stability: the 36-feature SVM degrades 14 pp under codec mismatch (9.5%-23.5% EER), while the four-feature RBF-SVM degrades only 5.9 pp (17.0%-22.9%). The F1 subset varies 3.4 pp across conditions versus 13.1 pp for the full set. F1 differences persist after controlling for speaker identity (p greater than 10^10, mixed-effects model). The results suggest that physically interpretable F1 statistics offer a compact, codec-stable diagnostic signal that may complement higher accuracy neural detectors.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13258PreviousA generalization of the map $\chi$NextFaiSonic MMD: A popular music dataset with temporally aligned multidimensional annotations for multitask music analysis
Related posts
Voice layer for any website – does it worth?
0Hacker News New
Brazil's AI Development Strategy Needs an Edge Layer – TechPolicy.Press
0Hacker News New
Generative AI and the temporary upskilling of knowledge workers
0Hacker News New
Anthropic Unveils Claude Whiteboards, Claude Sheets, and Claude Data
0Hacker News New
AI Cracks a Quantum Computing Bottleneck
0Hacker News New
Jack and Jill Cut Candidate Screening Costs by 88% with Jev
0Hacker News New