AI & ML
Greedy Alignment Principle for Optimizer Hyperparameter Selection
arXiv stat.ML0 views
arXiv:2512.06370v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent works have shown that gradient-update alignment is a powerful signal for modulating optimizer updates, often leading to faster training. We promote this update-wise heuristic as a mathematically grounded principle for selecting and tuning optimizer hyperparameters. By treating gradients and updates as signals and an optimizer as a causal filter that maps between them, we formulate optimizer selection as maximizing the expected drop rate in loss over a prescribed family of optimizers. We show that this objective is exactly the inner product between the optimizer filter and the gradient autocorrelation, and prove that a greedy optimum exists and has a stability bound under perturbations of the estimated gradient statistics. Specializing in momentum-based optimizers, the theory yields simple dynamic momentum selection rules for both SGD+Momentum and Adam/AdamW. Experiments across image classification, language model fine-tuning, and vision transformer fine-tuning show that the resulting dynamic momentum rules match or improve upon the best fixed hyperparameters found via manual sweeps, reducing the need for exhaustive momentum sweeps. Code is available at https://github.com/ironjr/gap
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06370PreviousOnline Budget Allocation with Censored Semi-Bandit FeedbackNextOracle-Robust Online Alignment for Large Language Models
Related posts
Stop running everything through LLMs: How I fixed my research agent
0Hacker News New
Lessons from Building a Deep Research System
0Hacker News New
Decomp of David Horner's Drain Storm (1997)
0Hacker News New
How Sustainable Is a Solar Powered Website? (2020)
0Hacker News New
Now indexed by Vuink,500K+ words. 742 turns.135 Knowledge domains – UKA-135
0Hacker News New
IDE extension that keeps me in control of AI-written code
0Hacker News New