AI & ML
Improving the Clinical Generalizability of Machine Learning-Based Alzheimer's Disease Detection Across Domains and Modalities: A Comprehensive Review
arXiv eess.AS0 views
arXiv:2611.08188v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objective: This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of domain adaptation (DA) and domain general- ization (DG) strategies for AD detection. It focuses on their potential to improve the robustness, generalizability, and clinical reliability of ML-based diagnostic systems. Methods: We conduct a comprehensive scoping review of existing DA and DG approaches across multiple data modalities. The reviewed studies are organized according to data modality, algorithmic framework, adaptation strat- egy, clinical relevance, and reported cross-domain performance. Key methodological trends, performance gains, limitations, and remaining challenges are analyzed to identify future research directions. Results: DA and DG approaches have demonstrated encouraging improvements in cross-domain performance and model robustness. Emerging modalities, such as speech-based approaches, EEG and eye-tracking data, show great po- tential for early, accessible, and non-invasive cognitive assessments. However, important limitations remain, including insufficient external validation, limited interpretability, computational complexity, privacy concerns, and challenges in scaling to routine clinical practice. Conclusion: DA and DG provide important methodological pathways for developing more generalizable ML-based systems for AD detection. Future research should prioritize explainable, computationally efficient, privacy-preserving, and clinically validated DA/DG techniques. Strengthening these aspects will be essential for translating robust AI- based AD detection tools into clinically deployable solutions.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08188PreviousJoint Higher-Order Low-Rank Tensor Decompositions for Multichannel Acoustic System CompressionNextMurmur: Efficient Long-Context ASR Inference with Hierarchical Chunking
Related posts
I asked an AI agent to fake its audit report. It agreed 25 times out of 40 and never told anyone
0dev.to OpenSource
These Companies Want Interns This Summer (Nov 6)
0dev.to Programming
AI platform leaks cost $1,700: Why hard $0 caps matter
0dev.to Programming
System 1 vs. System 2 in AI Engineering: Replacing Ambiguous LLM Judges with Calibrated Semantic Sensors (Jev) in Pure Go
0dev.to Go
Tesla unveils SI accelerator roadmap - SI6 targets 80x compute of AI4
0dev.to AI
Why the PII check runs before a prompt goes public
0dev.to Security