AI & ML
Watermark Robustness and Radioactivity May Be at Odds in Federated Learning
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2510.17033v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) across distributed data sources. As these sources increasingly include LLM-generated text, provenance tracking becomes essential for accountability and transparency. We adapt LLM watermarking for FL data provenance, where a subset of clients computes local updates on watermarked data, and the server averages all updates into the global LLM. We find that several evaluated LLM watermarks remain radioactive in this setup: the watermark signal stays detectable after fine-tuning, with a $p-$value reaching $10^{-24}$ even when only 6.6% of data is watermarked. However, the server can act as an active adversary, aiming to preserve model utility while evading provenance tracking. We observe that updates from watermarked synthetic data appear as outliers relative to clean updates. Our adversary thus applies strong robust aggregation to filter out these outliers along with the watermark signal. All evaluated radioactive watermarks are not robust against such an adversarial server. Our work suggests fundamental trade-offs between radioactivity, robustness, and utility.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17033PreviousFrom Concept to Measurement: A Survey of How the Blockchain Trilemma Can Be AnalyzedNextExpected Harm: Rethinking Safety Evaluation of (Mis)Aligned LLMs
Related posts

Etsy Digital Downloads: A File Checklist Before You Publish
0dev.to Design
15 YouTube Shorts, 2,674 views, 1 subscriber: promoting a dev tool without showing my face
0dev.to Discuss
A Five-Minute Morning Adhkar Routine for People Who Are Always Running Late
0dev.to Productivity

Managing Client Feedback on Video Edits
0dev.to Productivity

Making Printable Worksheets and Test Variants Without Surprises
0dev.to Productivity
SsakView: a free Windows viewer with region OCR, improved after user feedback
0dev.to Productivity