AI & ML
Watermark Robustness and Radioactivity May Be at Odds in Federated Learning
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2510.17033v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) across distributed data sources. As these sources increasingly include LLM-generated text, provenance tracking becomes essential for accountability and transparency. We adapt LLM watermarking for FL data provenance, where a subset of clients computes local updates on watermarked data, and the server averages all updates into the global LLM. We find that several evaluated LLM watermarks remain radioactive in this setup: the watermark signal stays detectable after fine-tuning, with a $p-$value reaching $10^{-24}$ even when only 6.6% of data is watermarked. However, the server can act as an active adversary, aiming to preserve model utility while evading provenance tracking. We observe that updates from watermarked synthetic data appear as outliers relative to clean updates. Our adversary thus applies strong robust aggregation to filter out these outliers along with the watermark signal. All evaluated radioactive watermarks are not robust against such an adversarial server. Our work suggests fundamental trade-offs between radioactivity, robustness, and utility.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17033PreviousFrom Concept to Measurement: A Survey of How the Blockchain Trilemma Can Be AnalyzedNextExpected Harm: Rethinking Safety Evaluation of (Mis)Aligned LLMs
Related posts

Mistral Large 4: Specs, Benchmarks, Pricing and Open Weights
0dev.to OpenSource
Building a 9,718-hotel database for foreign travellers in China
0dev.to Database
CRM'de izin yönetimi tasarlamak: Değişmez rıza defteri, kanal ve amaç ayrımı, gönderim anında kontrol ve geri çekme
0dev.to Database
Researchers are paid $5K for reporting a bug to OpenAI that would let attackers run code in logged-in sessions of all who…
0dev.to Security
Tech Panda: Empowering Businesses with Innovative Digital Solutions
0dev.to DevOps

AMD projects ~$17B in Q4 2026 revenue, compared to Intel's $15B to $16B, potentially overtaking Intel as the largest x86 processor vendor for the first time (Simon Sharwood/The Register)
0Techmeme