AI & ML
Stinging the Swarm: Extracting Attacker Intelligence from a Twin-Controller OT Honeypot
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2611.13406v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous language-model agents can drive industrial controllers over fieldbus protocols, probing a plant at machine speed and in coordinated swarms. We present Talos, an inline gate that judges every agent request to a controller in milliseconds and routes agents it flags as hostile to a device-faithful decoy -- a mirror twin of the real plant -- where their attack continues harmlessly and is read for intelligence. We evaluate the full pipeline (detect -> quarantine -> mirror -> extract) against 2,400 autonomous attacker agents, 600 in each of four tiers that escalate the attacker's effort to stay hidden, from no concealment to an explicit non-disclosure rule and a trained cover story. No write reached the real plant in any tier: the gate denies the damage path and a device-level envelope check backstops it, while unmapped registers are denied without exception and the gate still permits safe-direction stop commands. Decisions are model-driven in every tier with no inference timeouts, closing a common objection to small on-device judges. Beyond blocking, the pipeline reads the attacker. We find a behavioral structure along two axes -- how persistently an agent attacks and how much it discloses -- and show that the system has a capture channel for three of the four resulting regions: hardened, silent attackers escalate most and are read on the mirror; compliant, talkative attackers volunteer their identity to a diagnostic form before they are ever quarantined; only the paranoid, low-yield region resists both. Attacker identity fields are self-authored cover stories, but involuntary tells -- the self-reported toolchain fingerprint and the attacker's own list of targeted registers -- accumulate across the swarm into a high-confidence profile drawn from agents under explicit orders to stay silent. The gate, mirror, and harness are released under Apache 2.0 with a synthetic device family.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13406PreviousEarly Rug Pull Detection on SolanaNext5G CATS: 5G-Based Cryptographic Authorization Against Trafficking of Semiconductor Devices
Related posts
How Many Demonstrations Does a VLA Need? On the Sample Efficiency of VLA Finetuning
0arXiv cs.RO
Altitude-Adaptive UAV-to-Map Image Matching for Aerial Geo-Localization
0arXiv cs.RO
OASIS: Optimization-Aware Subgoal Inference with Safety Constraints for Autonomous Mobile Robot Navigation
0arXiv cs.RO
Fade to... Red? Scheduling Coloured Noise Exploration Supports Efficient Robot Learning with Reduced Movement Jerk
0arXiv cs.RO
DexForesight: Grounding Dexterous Policies with Implicit Spatial Foresight
0arXiv cs.RO
Control-Aware Command Generation for Asynchronous Control and Action Inference with Vision-Based Policies towards Fast Execution
0arXiv cs.RO