AI & ML
An Empirical Study on Clustering-based Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm for Regression Test Case Selection
arXiv cs.SE0 views
arXiv:2611.09869v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Regression testing assesses whether software components that have already been developed and tested continue to work correctly after modifications. Ideally, regression testing re-executes the entire test suite after each modification, but this is infeasible in real-world scenarios because of the computational burden; therefore, optimized approaches, such as Test Case Selection, have been developed. The state of the art in regression testing optimization includes both classical approaches, such as Additional Greedy and DIV-GA, and quantum approaches, such as SelectQA, BootQA, and IGDec-QAOA. However, while the former incur high computational costs, the latter are constrained by the physical limitations of currently available quantum machines. This paper extends the evaluation of QAOA-TCS, our quantum approach for the test case selection problem. We thoroughly evaluate its performance, compare it with state-of-the-art classical and quantum approaches, and assess its robustness to quantum noise. The results show that QAOA-TCS outperforms state-of-the-art multi-objective approaches in most cases and maintains stable performance even under high noise levels. In the single-objective formulation, QAOA-based methods perform comparably. In terms of efficiency, our previous method based on quantum annealing, namely SelectQA, is the most efficient for large problems in the multi-objective formulation, whereas QAOA-TCS offers the best trade-off between effectiveness and efficiency in the single-objective formulation when run on realistic noisy simulators. However, such analysis is constrained by the different computational environments used to run the algorithms.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09869PreviousAgents on the Patch Path: Mining AI-Associated Security Remediation in GitHub Security AdvisoriesNextLiterature Review of Mixed Reality Research
Related posts
The climate case for AI has not been made
0MIT Technology Review
I Let Pangram Loose on My Gmail Inbox. Here’s How Much AI It Found
0Wired
![Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.24: Advanced Autonomous Behaviors [KR]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fgmggiae4nyxpukfvgqba.png)
Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.24: Advanced Autonomous Behaviors [KR]
0dev.to
화면이 사람을 붙잡는 힘 — AB 1709 소송이 개발자에게 던지는 질문
0dev.to
![Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.12: Reversing and Parking [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F1k9m20qhwzb1csyeu5v1.png)
Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.12: Reversing and Parking [EN]
0dev.to
![Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.13: Docking and Charging [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Ff66zllmrqlif2vsyczxb.png)
Path Planning and Autonomous Navigation — Ch.13: Docking and Charging [EN]
0dev.to